Former Groq Employees Sue Company Over $20 Billion Quasi-Acquisition Deal With Nvidia
Former Groq employees Joshua Rubin and Benjamin Serebrin have filed a lawsuit against Groq in Delaware Chancery Court over its $20 billion deal with Nvidia. The suit alleges that the board breached its fiduciary duties by orchestrating a non-exclusive technology licensing and employee-transfer deal that unfairly favored management and transferring staff while harming minority shareholders. This lawsuit highlights mounting legal risks around 'quasi-acquisitions' and acqui-hire structures, which Big Tech firms increasingly use to absorb AI startups while evading traditional antitrust review. If successful, the case could set a precedent for protecting minority shareholders when startups opt for talent transfers and IP licensing instead of formal mergers. Of the $20 billion deal, $17 billion was allocated as a corporate licensing fee shared among shareholders, while $3 billion in Nvidia restricted stock was given directly to transferring Groq employees. The plaintiffs argue that the payout undervalued Groq's technical assets and created an unnecessary corporate tax burden by treating the $17 billion licensing fee as taxable revenue rather than acquisition proceeds.
## BACKGROUND
Major tech companies have recently adopted 'quasi-acquisitions'—structuring deals as technology licensing paired with targeted hiring of key personnel—to access specialized AI talent and intellectual property without triggering traditional merger oversight. Groq is an AI chip design startup known for pioneering the Language Processing Unit (LPU) architecture for high-speed AI inference.