China Rejects US AI Leaders' Threat Narratives on Frontier AI Pacing
China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs criticized calls from US AI executives to slow frontier AI development under the framing of national security threats from China, stating that spreading threat narratives disrupts global AI governance. The response followed Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei's essay 'We Must Pace the Frontier,' which gained support from Sam Altman and Elon Musk alongside warnings about Chinese AI progress. This exchange highlights the friction between domestic US AI safety initiatives and broader geopolitical technology competition. It demonstrates how discussions around frontier model safety standards remain deeply intertwined with international policy and global AI regulatory efforts. Amodei's proposal called for a three-step safety framework including employee-level access for independent external evaluators, industry-wide safety coordination, and international risk management. Foreign ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun countered that AI development should serve all humanity through open and inclusive cooperation rather than confrontational narratives.
## BACKGROUND
'Frontier AI' refers to the most advanced, large-scale general-purpose artificial intelligence models pushing the edge of capabilities in complex reasoning, multimodal understanding, and autonomous execution. The debate accelerated after Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei published 'We Must Pace the Frontier,' advocating for deliberate pacing of capability scaling alongside third-party evaluation inside leading AI labs.